A fixed-price gap analysis, remediation through to your audit, and upkeep after it. All in a workspace you keep.
All compliance →Led by a published security researcher with five CVEs. One standard report, letters for your buyers, and retests of your fixes.
All security →To the people you sell to, raise from or answer to.
All industries →Original research, free tools, and plain-language guides on security and compliance, from a published security researcher.
Read the blog →TRA for Toronto founders and operators. A TRA is what a government buyer, a prime contractor, or an enterprise vendor-risk team asks for when they want proof you have assessed your risk and can show your work. We test the environment first, with our offensive-security partner, then write the assessment, so every risk rating traces back to something we actually found instead of a template with your logo on it.
Toronto is where most Canadian enterprise buyers sit, which changes who reviews you rather than what you have to build. Bank, insurer and asset-manager procurement teams run deeper third-party reviews than a mid-market SaaS buyer, and they ask earlier in the cycle.
If any of your customers are federally regulated financial institutions, their own supervisory obligations reach you through their third-party risk process even though none of it binds you directly. Expect questions about continuity, concentration and your own critical suppliers on top of a standard security questionnaire.
The practical consequence is that a SOC 2 report alone is often not the end of the conversation here. Plan for the questionnaire that follows it.
The service itself is the same everywhere. Fixed scope, fixed price, and the same team. What changes by region is which requirement binds first and who is asking. The full detail is on the threat and risk assessment page, and prices are on the pricing page.
Free PDFs, no card
SOC 2 readiness, ISO 27001 gaps, incident response and vendor security, as PDFs you can print or forward. Free, no card.
From Jacob Masse, principal of traztech: the files by email, then a few short notes over the next month. No spam, unsubscribe in one click.
Toronto is the largest tech market in Canada and the centre of gravity for FinTech, regulated SaaS, and AI startups. Most of our team works out of the GTA, so a Toronto engagement gets you the tightest feedback loop we offer.
We’re a Toronto firm. Our default is in-person when it helps and async when it doesn’t. We know the local VC ecosystem and the talent pool, and we know how the buyers here review a vendor.
A TRA is what a government buyer, a prime contractor, or an enterprise vendor-risk team asks for when they want proof you have assessed your risk and can show your work. We test the environment first, with our offensive-security partner, then write the assessment, so every risk rating traces back to something we actually found instead of a template with your logo on it.
For the full service detail, see the Threat and Risk Assessment page. For fixed-price productized engagements, see pricing.
We do. traztech is a Canadian security and compliance firm working with startups and SMEs on Threat and Risk Assessment, led by a published security researcher with five disclosed CVEs. Engagements are fixed scope with published pricing, and the first call is free. Where an independent assessor, auditor or certification body is required, that is a separate firm from the one doing your readiness work. We will tell you plainly which parts we can and cannot sign.
Toronto is where most Canadian enterprise buyers sit, which changes who reviews you rather than what you have to build. Bank, insurer and asset-manager procurement teams run deeper third-party reviews than a mid-market SaaS buyer, and they ask earlier in the cycle. If any of your customers are federally regulated financial institutions, their own supervisory obligations reach you through their third-party risk process even though none of it binds you directly. Expect questions about continuity, concentration and your own critical suppliers on top of a standard security questionnaire. The practical consequence is that a SOC 2 report alone is often not the end of the conversation here. Plan for the questionnaire that follows it.
No. We are based in Toronto and work with companies across Canada and the United States. Readiness work is largely remote by nature: evidence, policies and control design do not require anybody in the room. Where physical and environmental controls are in scope, for example a data centre or an office in the audit boundary, we attend on site. We have run a dual-framework programme across three physical sites, so that scope is familiar rather than an exception.
Our pricing is fixed and published rather than quoted per city, because the work does not change with the postcode. What moves the number is scope: how many systems and sites are in the boundary, how much already exists, and how many frameworks you are running at once. The audit or assessment fee is separate and is paid to the independent firm that performs it. Every price we charge is on our pricing page.
It depends on the framework and on how much of the programme already exists. SOC 2 Type I commonly takes a few months from start to report, and a Type II adds a 3, 6 or 12 month observation window, because the auditor has to watch the controls operate. ISO 27001 certification commonly takes several months, including the Stage 1 and Stage 2 audits. What drives it is the gaps found, the observation period and the auditor’s or certification body’s schedule. We will give you a realistic date on the first call rather than the one you want to hear.
Yes, and we frequently do. We manage the relationship, handle evidence requests and represent you through fieldwork. Where you have not chosen one, we run the selection: setting out a documented readiness position before firms quote tends to bring the quotes down, and comparing several firms on identical scope shows how far apart they can be.
Book a free 30-minute discovery call. We’ll tell you whether this engagement fits, what it would cost, and when we could start.
Book a callEvery readiness programme needs a control library, an evidence register, policies and a score for the board. Being quoted five figures a year for that is normal. Paying it is not.
| traztech Workspace | Other GRC platforms | |
|---|---|---|
| Licence cost | $0. Free forever, no card, no paid tier | $7,500 to $50,000 a year, on an annual contract |
| Control library, evidence register, policy templates, risk register, vendor questionnaires, readiness scoring | Included | Included |
| What it costs inside an engagement with us | $0. You need a workspace either way | Unchanged. The subscription sits on top of the fee |
| What it does to your audit quote | A documented readiness position the audit firm can scope and price against | Nothing. The audit firm prices your readiness, not your tooling |
Platform pricing is a publicly reported range, since none of them publish a number. The fuller comparison, including when a paid platform is the better buy, is on the Workspace page.