Security

Real offensive depth

Testing and defence led by a published security researcher with five CVEs, including a CVSS 9.1 Mirai botnet kill-switch.

All security →
Compliance

Audit-ready, fixed scope

SOC 2, ISO, and the Canadian privacy stack, run end to end with an independent auditor.

All frameworks →
Resources

Learn the space

Original research, free tools, and plain-language guides on security and compliance, from a published security researcher.

Read the blog →
Who we help · by industry

Security and compliance for crypto and Web3

In crypto, a bug is a withdrawal. traztech brings offensive-security depth to smart-contract-adjacent infrastructure, key management, and the SOC 2 institutions now demand.

Book a discovery call See pricing

What you are up against

Crypto is the most adversarial environment in software. The threat actors are funded, the exploits are irreversible, and institutional buyers now expect traditional compliance on top.

Irreversible loss and key management

Private keys, signing infrastructure, and wallet custody are single points of catastrophic failure. Hot-wallet and HSM design decide your blast radius.

Infrastructure and API attack surface

Most losses come from compromised infrastructure, leaked keys, and API abuse, not just smart-contract bugs.

SOC 2 for institutional counterparties

Exchanges, custodians, and Web3 infrastructure firms now face SOC 2 requirements from institutional partners and banks.

Incident response under public scrutiny

On-chain incidents are public in real time. A slow or unclear response compounds the damage.

How traztech helps

We bring the offensive mindset this space requires, then add the compliance institutions ask for.

Penetration testing and red-team

Infrastructure, API, and key-management testing, where most real-world losses originate.

Penetration testing

Fractional CISO

Security program ownership, key-management policy, and counterparty diligence handling.

Fractional CISO

Incident response retainer

Named responders and a contracted SLA for the moment funds or keys are at risk.

IR Retainer

SOC 2 in 75 Days

The report institutional counterparties and banking partners increasingly require.

SOC 2 readiness

Why traztech is poised for Crypto & Web3

traztech is run by a published security researcher with five published CVEs, including CVE-2024-45163 (CVSS 9.1), the kill-switch for the Mirai botnet. We focus on the infrastructure, key management, and API surface where most real-world losses originate, not just the contract. In a space where bugs are withdrawals, that depth matters.

See the full research and CVE record, or read how we work with our partners. Once you are engaged, our auditor management & advocacy and vulnerability management services keep the program moving, tracked through your existing traztech Workspace.

Frequently asked questions

Do you audit smart contracts?

Our focus is the infrastructure, key management, API, and operational security around your protocol, where most real-world losses originate. For dedicated smart-contract audits we will scope adversarial testing with our offensive-security partner.

Why would a crypto company need SOC 2?

Institutional counterparties, custodial partners, and banks now require SOC 2 reports before they will work with exchanges and Web3 infrastructure firms. It is becoming table stakes for institutional access.

How should we manage private keys?

Through hardware security modules or vetted custody infrastructure, strict separation of hot and cold storage, multi-party signing, and access controls with full logging. We design and review key-management programs.

What does incident response look like for an on-chain event?

A retainer gives you named responders and a contracted SLA. On-chain incidents are public in real time, so a fast, clear, coordinated response is part of containing the damage.

Who runs the offensive testing?

We co-deliver penetration testing and red-team work with a specialist offensive-security partner. traztech runs the threat model and remediation, and our partner runs the adversarial testing.

Other segments we help

More pages by industry, plus the full who we help index.

Talk to traztech about Crypto & Web3

Book a free 30-minute discovery call. We will tell you what applies to you, what it would cost, and when we could start.

Book a call

The same work, without the line item

Every readiness programme needs a control library, an evidence register, policies and a score for the board. Being quoted five figures a year for that is normal. Paying it is not.

traztech Workspace Other GRC platforms
Licence cost $0. Free forever, no card, no paid tier $7,500 to $50,000 a year, on an annual contract
Control library, evidence register, policy templates, risk register, vendor questionnaires, readiness scoring Included Included
What it costs inside an engagement with us $0. You need a workspace either way Unchanged. The subscription sits on top of the fee
What it does to your audit quote $11,000 off a five-figure quote on one engagement, for a documented readiness position Nothing. The audit firm prices your readiness, not your tooling

Pricing in the right column is what compliance automation platforms are publicly reported to charge; none of them publish a number, so treat it as a range rather than a quote. The $11,000 came off the audit firm's own number once the readiness position was documented (the engagement). Where a paid platform is the better buy, and the fuller comparison, is on the Workspace page.

Track record

Who is actually doing the work

We are deliberately not a large firm, and we would rather show you the work than a wall of logos. Here is what is behind the advice.

5
Published CVEs, including a CVSS 9.1
76
Controls taken from nothing to a passed SOC 2 Type II
Zero
Exceptions on that Type II report
75 days
Readiness window we have hit every time we have run it
20+
Penetration testing engagements delivered

Published vulnerability research

Five published CVEs. CVE-2024-45163 (CVSS 9.1) is a flaw in the Mirai botnet itself, which gave defenders a way to shut down attacker infrastructure. CVE-2026-42626 takes HP ENVY 5000 printers offline from any unauthenticated device on the same network.

The printer is the one that matters on a compliance page: an asset nobody counts as a computer, on a flat network, downed by a device that never had to log in. Auditors ask how controls fail. We have found out first-hand.

A SOC 2 Type II built from nothing

At Humera, a venture-backed US security company, Jacob built the compliance programme in-house from nothing: no report, no policies, no documented controls. It ended in a Type II attestation across 76 controls with zero exceptions, on a team of 15.

The platform held 99.9% uptime throughout, which is the part most readiness projects get wrong: controls are easy to design and hard to retrofit onto a system people already depend on.

Recent engagements

For a Waterloo data centre operator we ran SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 together rather than one after the other, across a production campus, an AI compute platform and a self-hosted collaboration stack. Scoped so further Ontario and Quebec sites enter as they reach production. Findings delivered and remediated.

For an Ontario medtech company putting an AI clinical assistant in front of practitioners, we ran the gap analysis and built the evidence programme behind their SOC 2.

Before you go

Want this by email instead?

A few short notes on the security and compliance side of Crypto & Web3. Unsubscribe in one click, and replies reach me directly.

From Jacob Masse, principal of traztech. No spam, unsubscribe in one click.