Security

Real offensive depth

Testing and defence led by a published security researcher with five CVEs, including a CVSS 9.1 Mirai botnet kill-switch.

All security →
Compliance

Audit-ready, fixed scope

SOC 2, ISO, and the Canadian privacy stack, run end to end with an independent auditor.

All frameworks →
Resources

Learn the space

Original research, free tools, and plain-language guides on security and compliance, from a published security researcher.

Read the blog →
Who we help · by industry

Security and compliance for AI and ML companies

Shipping an LLM product opens a new attack surface and a new regulatory one. traztech covers the OWASP LLM Top 10, the EU AI Act, and Quebec Law 25.

Book a discovery call See pricing

What you are up against

AI products inherit every classic software risk and add a category of their own. Regulators are moving faster than most teams expect.

OWASP LLM Top 10

Prompt injection is LLM01, the top risk in AI applications. RAG leakage, insecure output handling, and agent abuse follow close behind.

EU AI Act

High-risk systems under Annex III face conformity-assessment obligations, with the relevant deadline landing in 2026.

Quebec Law 25

Section 12.1 requires meaningful disclosure of automated decision-making. If you serve Quebec users, this applies to your model.

SOC 2 plus model and data governance

AI buyers want SOC 2 and increasingly want answers on training-data provenance, shadow AI, and model access controls.

How traztech helps

We threat-model the AI surface, test it adversarially with our partner, and close the regulatory gaps.

AI / LLM security assessment

Threat modelling and a prompt-injection battery across direct, indirect, and agent tool-call vectors.

AI / LLM Security

Adversarial testing

traztech runs the threat model and our offensive-security partner runs the red-team. One engagement, two firms.

AI red-team

Law 25 and EU AI Act readiness

Automated-decision disclosure, conformity-assessment prep, and the governance documentation regulators expect.

Fractional CISO

SOC 2 in 75 Days

The report AI buyers ask for, scoped to include model and data-access controls.

SOC 2 readiness

Why traztech is poised for AI & ML Companies

traztech is run by a published security researcher with five published CVEs, including CVE-2024-45163 (CVSS 9.1), the kill-switch for the Mirai botnet. We co-deliver AI security with a specialist offensive partner: we build the threat model, they run the adversarial testing. You get offensive depth most AI security vendors cannot match.

See the full research and CVE record, or read how we work with our partners. Once you are engaged, our auditor management & advocacy and vulnerability management services keep the program moving, tracked through your existing traztech Workspace.

Frequently asked questions

What is the OWASP LLM Top 10?

It is the OWASP list of the most critical risks in LLM applications. Prompt injection is the top entry, followed by issues like sensitive information disclosure, insecure output handling, and excessive agency in agents.

Does the EU AI Act apply to us?

It applies if you place an AI system on the EU market or your output is used in the EU. High-risk systems under Annex III carry conformity-assessment obligations, with the relevant deadline in 2026.

What does Quebec Law 25 require for AI?

Section 12.1 requires that you inform individuals when a decision is based exclusively on automated processing and, on request, explain the personal information and factors used. If you serve Quebec users, this applies.

How do you test for prompt injection?

We run a battery covering direct, indirect, multi-turn, and agent tool-call injection, then RAG and data-layer leakage testing. The adversarial work is delivered with our offensive-security partner.

Do AI companies still need SOC 2?

Yes. Enterprise AI buyers ask for SOC 2 and increasingly add questions on training-data provenance, model access controls, and shadow AI. We scope the report to cover these.

Other segments we help

More pages by industry, plus the full who we help index.

Talk to traztech about AI & ML Companies

Book a free 30-minute discovery call. We will tell you what applies to you, what it would cost, and when we could start.

Book a call

The same work, without the line item

Every readiness programme needs a control library, an evidence register, policies and a score for the board. Being quoted five figures a year for that is normal. Paying it is not.

traztech Workspace Other GRC platforms
Licence cost $0. Free forever, no card, no paid tier $7,500 to $50,000 a year, on an annual contract
Control library, evidence register, policy templates, risk register, vendor questionnaires, readiness scoring Included Included
What it costs inside an engagement with us $0. You need a workspace either way Unchanged. The subscription sits on top of the fee
What it does to your audit quote $11,000 off a five-figure quote on one engagement, for a documented readiness position Nothing. The audit firm prices your readiness, not your tooling

Pricing in the right column is what compliance automation platforms are publicly reported to charge; none of them publish a number, so treat it as a range rather than a quote. The $11,000 came off the audit firm's own number once the readiness position was documented (the engagement). Where a paid platform is the better buy, and the fuller comparison, is on the Workspace page.

Track record

Who is actually doing the work

We are deliberately not a large firm, and we would rather show you the work than a wall of logos. Here is what is behind the advice.

5
Published CVEs, including a CVSS 9.1
76
Controls taken from nothing to a passed SOC 2 Type II
Zero
Exceptions on that Type II report
75 days
Readiness window we have hit every time we have run it
20+
Penetration testing engagements delivered

Published vulnerability research

Five published CVEs. CVE-2024-45163 (CVSS 9.1) is a flaw in the Mirai botnet itself, which gave defenders a way to shut down attacker infrastructure. CVE-2026-42626 takes HP ENVY 5000 printers offline from any unauthenticated device on the same network.

The printer is the one that matters on a compliance page: an asset nobody counts as a computer, on a flat network, downed by a device that never had to log in. Auditors ask how controls fail. We have found out first-hand.

A SOC 2 Type II built from nothing

At Humera, a venture-backed US security company, Jacob built the compliance programme in-house from nothing: no report, no policies, no documented controls. It ended in a Type II attestation across 76 controls with zero exceptions, on a team of 15.

The platform held 99.9% uptime throughout, which is the part most readiness projects get wrong: controls are easy to design and hard to retrofit onto a system people already depend on.

Recent engagements

For a Waterloo data centre operator we ran SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 together rather than one after the other, across a production campus, an AI compute platform and a self-hosted collaboration stack. Scoped so further Ontario and Quebec sites enter as they reach production. Findings delivered and remediated.

For an Ontario medtech company putting an AI clinical assistant in front of practitioners, we ran the gap analysis and built the evidence programme behind their SOC 2.

Before you go

Want this by email instead?

A few short notes on the security and compliance side of AI & ML Companies. Unsubscribe in one click, and replies reach me directly.

From Jacob Masse, principal of traztech. No spam, unsubscribe in one click.