A fixed-price gap analysis, remediation through to your audit, and upkeep after it. All in a workspace you keep.
All compliance →Led by a published security researcher with five CVEs. One standard report, letters for your buyers, and retests of your fixes.
All security →To the people you sell to, raise from or answer to.
All industries →Original research, free tools, and plain-language guides on security and compliance, from a published security researcher.
Read the blog →Quebec Law 25 has no certification, so cost sits in the readiness sprint and ongoing operations, with bilingual documentation where required. The figures below are planning estimates in CAD.
For what we charge rather than the market range, see our fixed-scope pricing, or every cost breakdown we have written.
Every figure below is a planning estimate that varies by scope. See also Quebec Law 25 for Canadian startups.
Typical ranges in Canadian dollars. These are estimates for planning, not quotes.
| Cost area | Typical range (CAD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Readiness sprint | $12,000 - $40,000 | Governance, consent, PIAs, and incident-process setup. |
| Certification | None | Law 25 is not certified, so there is no audit fee. |
| Tooling | Varies | Consent, privacy-impact-assessment templates, and an incident register. |
| Ongoing operations | Recurring | Privacy-officer time, bilingual updates, and PIAs for new projects. |
Run Law 25 and PIPEDA together, template your privacy impact assessments and incident register, and reuse existing security controls as safeguards.
traztech offers fixed-scope, productized engagements so the number is predictable. See pricing, or the Security and Compliance service page.
Reading about a framework only gets you so far. Our free compliance workspace takes you through all 39 obligations of Quebec Law 25, one at a time, each explained in plain English with what an auditor will want to see, plus somewhere to attach the evidence and a readiness score that moves as you close gaps. No credit card, no trial clock, nothing locked.
The workspace is free and stays free. TrazTech makes money when someone wants help closing the gaps it finds, not from the tool.
The control library, the evidence, the policies and the readiness score all have to live somewhere. That is normally quoted as an annual subscription. Ours is free, and it is the same workspace we run engagements in.
| traztech Workspace | Other GRC platforms | |
|---|---|---|
| Licence cost | $0. Free forever, no card, no paid tier | $7,500 to $50,000 a year, on an annual contract |
| Control library, evidence register, policy templates, risk register, vendor questionnaires, readiness scoring | Included | Included |
| What it costs inside an engagement with us | $0. You need a workspace either way | Unchanged. The subscription sits on top of the fee |
| What it does to your audit quote | A documented readiness position the audit firm can scope and price against | Nothing. The audit firm prices your readiness, not your tooling |
Platform pricing is a publicly reported range, since none of them publish a number. The fuller comparison, including when a paid platform is the better buy, is on the Workspace page.
The added obligations (privacy impact assessments, automated-decision disclosure, a formal incident register, and bilingual documentation where required) add work beyond a baseline PIPEDA program.
No. Every figure here is a planning estimate in Canadian dollars that varies with scope, company size, and existing maturity. We give you a firm quote after a short scoping call.
Run Law 25 and PIPEDA together, template your privacy impact assessments and incident register, and reuse existing security controls as safeguards.
Book a free discovery call. We will tell you whether Quebec Law 25 fits, what it would take, and roughly what it would cost.
A step-by-step guide to Quebec Law 25 compliance: applicability, privacy officer, PIA, consent, incident response, …
How to delegate the privacy officer role in writing, what the officer does, request deadlines, the incident registe…
Quebec Law 25 applies if you handle personal information of Quebec residents. Here is who genuinely needs to comply…
Every Law 25 obligation now in force, the cross-border transfer assessment most SaaS companies miss, and what the C…
Quebec Law 25 hits fintech hardest: PIAs, breach rules, automated decision disclosure, and fines up to 4% of revenu…
Quebec Law 25 applies to any B2B SaaS company handling Quebec residents' data, with fines up to 4% of global turnov…
Free PDFs, no card
SOC 2 readiness, ISO 27001 gaps, incident response and vendor security, as PDFs you can print or forward. Free, no card.
From Jacob Masse, principal of traztech: the files by email, then a few short notes over the next month. No spam, unsubscribe in one click.
Track record
We would rather show you the work than a wall of logos. Here is what is behind the advice.
Five published CVEs. CVE-2024-45163 (CVSS 9.1) is a flaw in the Mirai botnet itself, which gave defenders a way to shut down attacker infrastructure. CVE-2026-42626 takes HP ENVY 5000 printers offline from any unauthenticated device on the same network.
The printer is the one that matters on a compliance page: an asset nobody counts as a computer, on a flat network, downed by a device that never had to log in. Auditors ask how controls fail. We have found out first-hand.
At Humera, a venture-backed US security company, Jacob built the compliance programme in-house from nothing: no report, no policies, no documented controls. It ended in a Type II attestation with zero exceptions.
The platform stayed in production throughout, which is the part most readiness projects get wrong: controls are easy to design and hard to retrofit onto a system people already depend on.
For a Waterloo data centre operator we ran SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 together rather than one after the other, across a production campus, an AI compute platform and a self-hosted collaboration stack. Scoped so further Ontario and Quebec sites enter as they reach production. Findings delivered and remediated.
For an Ontario medtech company putting an AI clinical assistant in front of practitioners, we ran the gap analysis and built the evidence programme behind their SOC 2.