Security

Real offensive depth

Testing and defence led by a published security researcher with five CVEs, including a CVSS 9.1 Mirai botnet kill-switch.

All security →
Compliance

Audit-ready, fixed scope

SOC 2, ISO, CPCSC, and the Canadian privacy stack, run end to end with an independent auditor.

All frameworks →
Resources

Learn the space

Original research, free tools, and plain-language guides on security and compliance, from a published security researcher.

Read the blog →
Cost in CAD · Estimates

Quebec Law 25 Cost in Canada (CAD)

Quebec Law 25 has no certification, so cost sits in the readiness sprint and ongoing operations, with bilingual documentation where required. The figures below are planning estimates in CAD.

For what we charge rather than the market range, see our fixed-scope pricing, or every cost breakdown we have written.

Get a scoped Quebec Law 25 quote What Quebec Law 25 is

Every figure below is a planning estimate that varies by scope. See also Quebec Law 25 for Canadian startups.

From $6,000 CAD · 4 weeks See full pricing →

Quebec Law 25 cost breakdown

Typical ranges in Canadian dollars. These are estimates for planning, not quotes.

Cost areaTypical range (CAD)Notes
Readiness sprint$12,000 - $40,000Governance, consent, PIAs, and incident-process setup.
CertificationNoneLaw 25 is not certified, so there is no audit fee.
ToolingVariesConsent, privacy-impact-assessment templates, and an incident register.
Ongoing operationsRecurringPrivacy-officer time, bilingual updates, and PIAs for new projects.

What moves the Quebec Law 25 number

01

Size of your Quebec data footprint

02

Whether you use automated decision-making

03

Volume of privacy impact assessments

04

Bilingual documentation requirements

How to reduce Quebec Law 25 cost

Run Law 25 and PIPEDA together, template your privacy impact assessments and incident register, and reuse existing security controls as safeguards.

traztech offers fixed-scope, productized engagements so the number is predictable. See pricing, or the Security and Compliance service page.

Walk Quebec Law 25 control by control, for free

Reading about a framework only gets you so far. Our free compliance workspace takes you through all 39 obligations of Quebec Law 25, one at a time, each explained in plain English with what an auditor will want to see, plus somewhere to attach the evidence and a readiness score that moves as you close gaps. No credit card, no trial clock, nothing locked.

Start your free Quebec Law 25 assessment See what is in the Workspace

The workspace is free and stays free. Traztech makes money when someone wants help closing the gaps it finds, not from the tool.

You do not have to buy a platform to run Quebec Law 25

The control library, the evidence, the policies and the readiness score all have to live somewhere. That is normally quoted as an annual subscription. Ours is free, and it is the same workspace we run engagements in.

traztech Workspace Other GRC platforms
Licence cost $0. Free forever, no card, no paid tier $7,500 to $50,000 a year, on an annual contract
Control library, evidence register, policy templates, risk register, vendor questionnaires, readiness scoring Included Included
What it costs inside an engagement with us $0. You need a workspace either way Unchanged. The subscription sits on top of the fee
What it does to your audit quote $11,000 off a five-figure quote on one engagement, for a documented readiness position Nothing. The audit firm prices your readiness, not your tooling

Pricing in the right column is what compliance automation platforms are publicly reported to charge; none of them publish a number, so treat it as a range rather than a quote. The $11,000 came off the audit firm's own number once the readiness position was documented (the engagement). Where a paid platform is the better buy, and the fuller comparison, is on the Workspace page.

Quebec Law 25 questions

What makes Law 25 cost more than PIPEDA?

The added obligations (privacy impact assessments, automated-decision disclosure, a formal incident register, and bilingual documentation where required) add work beyond a baseline PIPEDA program.

Are these Quebec Law 25 cost figures fixed?

No. Every figure here is a planning estimate in Canadian dollars that varies with scope, company size, and existing maturity. We give you a firm quote after a short scoping call.

How can we reduce Quebec Law 25 cost?

Run Law 25 and PIPEDA together, template your privacy impact assessments and incident register, and reuse existing security controls as safeguards.

Move on Quebec Law 25 with a team that has done it

Book a free discovery call. We will tell you whether Quebec Law 25 fits, what it would take, and roughly what it would cost.

Book a call Contact us

Quebec Law 25 guides worth reading

Track record

Who is actually doing the work

We are deliberately not a large firm, and we would rather show you the work than a wall of logos. Here is what is behind the advice.

5
Published CVEs, including a CVSS 9.1
76
Controls taken from nothing to a passed SOC 2 Type II
Zero
Exceptions on that Type II report
75 days
Readiness window we have hit every time we have run it

Published vulnerability research

Five published CVEs. CVE-2024-45163 (CVSS 9.1) is a flaw in the Mirai botnet itself, which gave defenders a way to shut down attacker infrastructure. CVE-2026-42626 takes HP ENVY 5000 printers offline from any unauthenticated device on the same network.

The printer is the one that matters on a compliance page: an asset nobody counts as a computer, on a flat network, downed by a device that never had to log in. Auditors ask how controls fail. We have found out first-hand.

A SOC 2 Type II built from nothing

At Humera, a venture-backed US security company, Jacob built the compliance programme in-house from nothing: no report, no policies, no documented controls. It ended in a Type II attestation across 76 controls with zero exceptions, on a team of 15.

The platform held 99.9% uptime throughout, which is the part most readiness projects get wrong: controls are easy to design and hard to retrofit onto a system people already depend on.

Recent engagements

For a Waterloo data centre operator we ran SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 together rather than one after the other, across a production campus, an AI compute platform and a self-hosted collaboration stack. Scoped so further Ontario and Quebec sites enter as they reach production. Findings delivered and remediated.

For an Ontario medtech company putting an AI clinical assistant in front of practitioners, we ran the gap analysis and built the evidence programme behind their SOC 2.

Before you go

Working through Quebec Law 25?

I send a few short notes on Quebec Law 25: what it actually asks for, what it costs, and the parts teams usually get wrong. Unsubscribe in one click, and replies reach me directly.

From Jacob Masse, founder of traztech. No spam, unsubscribe in one click.