Testing and defence led by a published security researcher with five CVEs, including a CVSS 9.1 Mirai botnet kill-switch.
All security →SOC 2, ISO, CPCSC, and the Canadian privacy stack, run end to end with an independent auditor.
All frameworks →Original research, free tools, and plain-language guides on security and compliance, from a published security researcher.
Read the blog →GDPR has no certification, so cost sits in the readiness program, tooling, and ongoing privacy operations. The figures below are planning estimates in CAD.
For what we charge rather than the market range, see our fixed-scope pricing, or every cost breakdown we have written.
Every figure below is a planning estimate that varies by scope. See also GDPR for Canadian startups.
Typical ranges in Canadian dollars. These are estimates for planning, not quotes.
| Cost area | Typical range (CAD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Readiness / data-mapping program | $15,000 - $50,000 | Data mapping, lawful bases, DPAs, and rights workflows. |
| Assessments (DPIAs) | Included in readiness | Data Protection Impact Assessments where required; no certification fee. |
| Tooling | Varies | Consent management, DSAR handling, and records of processing. |
| Ongoing privacy operations | Recurring | DPO or privacy-team time and continuous rights handling. |
Minimize data collection, align GDPR with PIPEDA and Quebec Law 25 in one program, and use privacy tooling for data-subject requests and records rather than handling them manually.
traztech offers fixed-scope, productized engagements so the number is predictable. See pricing, or the Security and Compliance service page.
Reading about a framework only gets you so far. Our free compliance workspace takes you through all 60 obligations of GDPR, one at a time, each explained in plain English with what an auditor will want to see, plus somewhere to attach the evidence and a readiness score that moves as you close gaps. No credit card, no trial clock, nothing locked.
The workspace is free and stays free. Traztech makes money when someone wants help closing the gaps it finds, not from the tool.
The control library, the evidence, the policies and the readiness score all have to live somewhere. That is normally quoted as an annual subscription. Ours is free, and it is the same workspace we run engagements in.
| traztech Workspace | Other GRC platforms | |
|---|---|---|
| Licence cost | $0. Free forever, no card, no paid tier | $7,500 to $50,000 a year, on an annual contract |
| Control library, evidence register, policy templates, risk register, vendor questionnaires, readiness scoring | Included | Included |
| What it costs inside an engagement with us | $0. You need a workspace either way | Unchanged. The subscription sits on top of the fee |
| What it does to your audit quote | $11,000 off a five-figure quote on one engagement, for a documented readiness position | Nothing. The audit firm prices your readiness, not your tooling |
Pricing in the right column is what compliance automation platforms are publicly reported to charge; none of them publish a number, so treat it as a range rather than a quote. The $11,000 came off the audit firm's own number once the readiness position was documented (the engagement). Where a paid platform is the better buy, and the fuller comparison, is on the Workspace page.
Yes. One data map and privacy program can cover GDPR, PIPEDA, and Quebec Law 25, which is far cheaper than three separate efforts.
No. Every figure here is a planning estimate in Canadian dollars that varies with scope, company size, and existing maturity. We give you a firm quote after a short scoping call.
Minimize data collection, align GDPR with PIPEDA and Quebec Law 25 in one program, and use privacy tooling for data-subject requests and records rather than handling them manually.
Book a free discovery call. We will tell you whether GDPR fits, what it would take, and roughly what it would cost.
PIPEDA and GDPR overlap but differ in scope and enforcement. Learn who each law applies to, where Canadian companie…
Every framework costs time and money. Here is how to decide which one to tackle first based on your customers, your…
Track record
We are deliberately not a large firm, and we would rather show you the work than a wall of logos. Here is what is behind the advice.
Five published CVEs. CVE-2024-45163 (CVSS 9.1) is a flaw in the Mirai botnet itself, which gave defenders a way to shut down attacker infrastructure. CVE-2026-42626 takes HP ENVY 5000 printers offline from any unauthenticated device on the same network.
The printer is the one that matters on a compliance page: an asset nobody counts as a computer, on a flat network, downed by a device that never had to log in. Auditors ask how controls fail. We have found out first-hand.
At Humera, a venture-backed US security company, Jacob built the compliance programme in-house from nothing: no report, no policies, no documented controls. It ended in a Type II attestation across 76 controls with zero exceptions, on a team of 15.
The platform held 99.9% uptime throughout, which is the part most readiness projects get wrong: controls are easy to design and hard to retrofit onto a system people already depend on.
For a Waterloo data centre operator we ran SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 together rather than one after the other, across a production campus, an AI compute platform and a self-hosted collaboration stack. Scoped so further Ontario and Quebec sites enter as they reach production. Findings delivered and remediated.
For an Ontario medtech company putting an AI clinical assistant in front of practitioners, we ran the gap analysis and built the evidence programme behind their SOC 2.
Before you go
I send a few short notes on GDPR: what it actually asks for, what it costs, and the parts teams usually get wrong. Unsubscribe in one click, and replies reach me directly.
From Jacob Masse, founder of traztech. No spam, unsubscribe in one click.