Compliance

Phase 1, Phase 2, then keep it running

A fixed-price gap analysis, remediation through to your audit, and upkeep after it. All in a workspace you keep.

All compliance →
Security

Testing, review and leadership

Led by a published security researcher with five CVEs. One standard report, letters for your buyers, and retests of your fixes.

All security →
Who we help

Prove you are secure

To the people you sell to, raise from or answer to.

All industries →
Resources

Learn the space

Original research, free tools, and plain-language guides on security and compliance, from a published security researcher.

Read the blog →
AI security & governance

AI Governance Program

From $3,500 CAD · scoped to you

AI is already in your organization, whether you governed it or not.

Book a discovery call See pricing

We stand up a practical AI governance program (a usable AI policy, a risk register, a model and tool inventory, and human-oversight controls) so you can adopt AI on purpose and answer for it when customers or regulators ask.

Built for teams that...

  • Companies adopting AI across products and internal workflows
  • Teams facing customer, board, or regulator questions about AI use
  • Organizations preparing for ISO 42001 or the EU AI Act
  • Leaders who want AI adoption to be deliberate and defensible

What we do

  • A practical AI acceptable-use policy your team will actually follow
  • An AI risk register that tracks and prioritizes real risks
  • An inventory of the AI models, tools, and vendors in use across the org
  • Human-oversight and accountability controls for higher-risk uses
  • Alignment with ISO 42001 and EU AI Act expectations where relevant

What you walk away with

You get a governance program that makes AI adoption deliberate and defensible: clear policy, a live risk register and model inventory, and oversight controls. It is the foundation for ISO 42001 or EU AI Act readiness.

Explore related work

Frequently asked questions

What does an AI governance program actually contain?

At minimum: an AI acceptable-use policy, a risk register, an inventory of the models and tools in use, and human-oversight controls for higher-risk uses. We tailor the depth to your size and risk.

How does this relate to ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act?

A governance program is the foundation both build on. We can align the program to ISO 42001’s AI management system structure and to EU AI Act obligations so later readiness work is faster.

We are small. Do we really need this?

The program scales down. Even a lightweight policy, inventory, and risk register put you well ahead of most peers and answer the AI questions customers are starting to ask.

Can you also secure the AI, not just govern it?

Yes. Governance pairs naturally with our AI security assessments, which test the systems themselves rather than just the policy around them.

The workspace is included, not quoted

The price above covers the work. It also covers where the work lives, which most buyers are quoted separately as an annual platform subscription.

traztech Workspace Other GRC platforms
Licence cost $0. Free forever, no card, no paid tier $7,500 to $50,000 a year, on an annual contract
Control library, evidence register, policy templates, risk register, vendor questionnaires, readiness scoring Included Included
What it costs inside an engagement with us $0. You need a workspace either way Unchanged. The subscription sits on top of the fee
What it does to your audit quote A documented readiness position the audit firm can scope and price against Nothing. The audit firm prices your readiness, not your tooling

Platform pricing is a publicly reported range, since none of them publish a number. The fuller comparison, including when a paid platform is the better buy, is on the Workspace page.

AI Governance Program, on your timeline

Book a free 30-minute call. We’ll tell you whether it fits, what it costs, and when we can start.

Book a call

Not ready to scope this yet? Open a free Workspace and score yourself against the framework first. It is the same register we work from during an engagement, so nothing you do there gets thrown away.

See what the Workspace does →

Free PDFs, no card

Get the checklists that go with this

SOC 2 readiness, ISO 27001 gaps, incident response and vendor security, as PDFs you can print or forward. Free, no card.

From Jacob Masse, principal of traztech: the files by email, then a few short notes over the next month. No spam, unsubscribe in one click.

Track record

Who is actually doing the work

We would rather show you the work than a wall of logos. Here is what is behind the advice.

5
Published CVEs, including a CVSS 9.1
Zero
Exceptions on a SOC 2 Type II built from nothing in-house

Published vulnerability research

Five published CVEs. CVE-2024-45163 (CVSS 9.1) is a flaw in the Mirai botnet itself, which gave defenders a way to shut down attacker infrastructure. CVE-2026-42626 takes HP ENVY 5000 printers offline from any unauthenticated device on the same network.

The printer is the one that matters on a compliance page: an asset nobody counts as a computer, on a flat network, downed by a device that never had to log in. Auditors ask how controls fail. We have found out first-hand.

A SOC 2 Type II built from nothing

At Humera, a venture-backed US security company, Jacob built the compliance programme in-house from nothing: no report, no policies, no documented controls. It ended in a Type II attestation with zero exceptions.

The platform stayed in production throughout, which is the part most readiness projects get wrong: controls are easy to design and hard to retrofit onto a system people already depend on.

Recent engagements

For a Waterloo data centre operator we ran SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 together rather than one after the other, across a production campus, an AI compute platform and a self-hosted collaboration stack. Scoped so further Ontario and Quebec sites enter as they reach production. Findings delivered and remediated.

For an Ontario medtech company putting an AI clinical assistant in front of practitioners, we ran the gap analysis and built the evidence programme behind their SOC 2.