A fixed-price gap analysis, remediation through to your audit, and upkeep after it. All in a workspace you keep.
All compliance →Led by a published security researcher with five CVEs. One standard report, letters for your buyers, and retests of your fixes.
All security →To the people you sell to, raise from or answer to.
All industries →Original research, free tools, and plain-language guides on security and compliance, from a published security researcher.
Read the blog →Zero Trust is a security model built on the principle "never trust, always verify." It assumes no user, device, or network is trustworthy by default, so every access request is authenticated, authorized, and continuously validated regardless of where it originates. It replaces the old model of a trusted internal network behind a perimeter.
In a Zero Trust architecture, being inside the corporate network grants nothing on its own. Access decisions hinge on verified identity, device health, and least privilege, evaluated per request.
Zero Trust is a strategy delivered through many controls: strong identity and MFA, micro-segmentation, device posture checks, and continuous monitoring. It is a direction you move toward, not a product you install.
traztech delivers zero-trust architecture rollouts for startups and growth-stage companies, led by a published security researcher.
Book a callFor a broader look at getting audit-ready, see our SOC 2 readiness work, or talk to a fractional CISO about building a program around it.
Free PDFs, no card
SOC 2 readiness, ISO 27001 gaps, incident response and vendor security, as PDFs you can print or forward. Free, no card.
From Jacob Masse, principal of traztech: the files by email, then a few short notes over the next month. No spam, unsubscribe in one click.
Zero trust arrives in questionnaires more often than in engagements. A buyer asks whether you operate a zero trust architecture and somebody has to answer honestly without either overclaiming or sounding behind.
In practice the useful parts for a growing company are identity-centric access, per-request authorisation, and removing implicit trust from network location. Those are concrete and evidenceable. The term itself is not.
No. It is an architectural approach. Vendors sell components that support it, but no single purchase makes an organisation zero trust.
Describe what you actually do: MFA everywhere, least privilege, per-request authorisation, no implicit trust from being inside a network. Overclaiming here is easy to catch and damages the rest of your answers.