Testing and defence led by a published security researcher with five CVEs, including a CVSS 9.1 Mirai botnet kill-switch.
All security →SOC 2, ISO, CPCSC, and the Canadian privacy stack, run end to end with an independent auditor.
All frameworks →Original research, free tools, and plain-language guides on security and compliance, from a published security researcher.
Read the blog →CPCSC cost depends heavily on the certification level required. A Level 1 self-assessment is the lowest-cost entry point; Level 2 is a different order of magnitude because it adds 84 more requirements and an external assessor. The figures below are planning estimates in CAD and are confirmed during scoping.
For what we charge rather than the market range, see our fixed-scope pricing, or every cost breakdown we have written.
Every figure below is a planning estimate that varies by scope. See also CPCSC for Canadian startups.
Typical ranges in Canadian dollars. These are estimates for planning, not quotes.
| Cost area | Typical range (CAD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Readiness, gap, and SSP (Level 1) | $15,000 - $50,000 | Scoping, ITSP.10.171 gap assessment, SSP, and POA&M. |
| Readiness program (Level 2) | $60,000 - $150,000 | All 98 requirements, boundary design, SSP, POA&M, evidence, and a mock assessment. |
| Certification body assessment (Level 2) | Assessor-dependent | Paid to the accredited certification body, not to us. Scales with boundary size. |
| Tooling | Varies | Logging, MFA, encryption, vulnerability scanning, and configuration hardening. Level 2 usually adds tooling Level 1 does not require. |
| Ongoing | Recurring | Maintaining controls, annual affirmation, and re-attestation or re-assessment. |
Scope tightly to the systems that handle protected information, and consider an enclave rather than certifying your whole environment. Reuse any NIST SP 800-171 or CMMC work you already have. Confirm the level your contracts actually require before building for Level 2, and start early enough that remediation is not billed as an emergency.
traztech offers fixed-scope, productized engagements so the number is predictable. See pricing, or the CPCSC Readiness service page.
Reading about a framework only gets you so far. Our free compliance workspace takes you through every requirement one at a time, each explained in plain English with what an assessor will want to see, plus somewhere to attach the evidence and a readiness score that moves as you close gaps. CPCSC has more than one level, so pick the one you are certifying to. No credit card, no trial clock, nothing locked.
Or See what is in the Workspace first.
The workspace is free and stays free. Traztech makes money when someone wants help closing the gaps it finds, not from the tool.
The control library, the evidence, the policies and the readiness score all have to live somewhere. That is normally quoted as an annual subscription. Ours is free, and it is the same workspace we run engagements in.
| traztech Workspace | Other GRC platforms | |
|---|---|---|
| Licence cost | $0. Free forever, no card, no paid tier | $7,500 to $50,000 a year, on an annual contract |
| Control library, evidence register, policy templates, risk register, vendor questionnaires, readiness scoring | Included | Included |
| What it costs inside an engagement with us | $0. You need a workspace either way | Unchanged. The subscription sits on top of the fee |
| What it does to your audit quote | $11,000 off a five-figure quote on one engagement, for a documented readiness position | Nothing. The audit firm prices your readiness, not your tooling |
Pricing in the right column is what compliance automation platforms are publicly reported to charge; none of them publish a number, so treat it as a range rather than a quote. The $11,000 came off the audit firm's own number once the readiness position was documented (the engagement). Where a paid platform is the better buy, and the fuller comparison, is on the Workspace page.
The certification level required and how much of your environment handles protected information. A Level 1 self-assessment is the lowest-cost entry point. Level 2 costs considerably more because it covers all 98 requirements and adds an external assessment paid to an accredited certification body.
No. Every figure here is a planning estimate in Canadian dollars that varies with scope, company size, and existing maturity. We give you a firm quote after a short scoping call.
Scope tightly to the systems that handle protected information, and consider an enclave rather than certifying your whole environment. Reuse any NIST SP 800-171 or CMMC work you already have. Confirm the level your contracts actually require before building for Level 2, and start early enough that remediation is not billed as an emergency.
Book a free discovery call. We will tell you whether CPCSC fits, what it would take, and roughly what it would cost.
Most Canadian firms without DND contracts do not need CPCSC yet. Here is who genuinely needs Level 1 or Level 2 now…
A practical walkthrough for getting CPCSC certified, from scoping to submission, with realistic timelines for Level…
ITSP.10.171 is Canada's adaptation of NIST SP 800-171, underpinning CPCSC certification for defence suppliers. Lear…
CPCSC Level 1 is live and starts appearing in federal defence contracts this summer. Here is what the 13 security r…
Canada's CPCSC borrows heavily from the U.S. CMMC, but the standard, the assessors, and the attestation platform ar…
A plain-language breakdown of all 13 CPCSC Level 1 self-assessed controls under ITSP.10.171, what each one requires…
Track record
We are deliberately not a large firm, and we would rather show you the work than a wall of logos. Here is what is behind the advice.
Five published CVEs. CVE-2024-45163 (CVSS 9.1) is a flaw in the Mirai botnet itself, which gave defenders a way to shut down attacker infrastructure. CVE-2026-42626 takes HP ENVY 5000 printers offline from any unauthenticated device on the same network.
The printer is the one that matters on a compliance page: an asset nobody counts as a computer, on a flat network, downed by a device that never had to log in. Auditors ask how controls fail. We have found out first-hand.
At Humera, a venture-backed US security company, Jacob built the compliance programme in-house from nothing: no report, no policies, no documented controls. It ended in a Type II attestation across 76 controls with zero exceptions, on a team of 15.
The platform held 99.9% uptime throughout, which is the part most readiness projects get wrong: controls are easy to design and hard to retrofit onto a system people already depend on.
For a Waterloo data centre operator we ran SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 together rather than one after the other, across a production campus, an AI compute platform and a self-hosted collaboration stack. Scoped so further Ontario and Quebec sites enter as they reach production. Findings delivered and remediated.
For an Ontario medtech company putting an AI clinical assistant in front of practitioners, we ran the gap analysis and built the evidence programme behind their SOC 2.
Before you go
I send a few short notes on CPCSC: what it actually asks for, what it costs, and the parts teams usually get wrong. Unsubscribe in one click, and replies reach me directly.
From Jacob Masse, founder of traztech. No spam, unsubscribe in one click.