Security

Real offensive depth

Testing and defence led by a published security researcher with six CVEs, including a CVSS 9.1 Mirai botnet kill-switch.

All security →
Compliance

Audit-ready, fixed scope

SOC 2, ISO, CPCSC, and the Canadian privacy stack, run end to end with an independent auditor.

All frameworks →
/var/www/traztech.ca/html/blog/post.php on line 12748
22; color:
Warning: Undefined array key "Compliance" in /var/www/traztech.ca/html/blog/post.php on line 12748
;">Compliance

SOC 2 for Fintech

If you sell software that touches money, someone on the other side of the deal is going to ask for SOC 2 before they sign. It might be a bank's vendor risk team, a payment processor's onboarding checklist, or an enterprise customer's procurement department. In fintech, this question doesn't come up occasionally. It comes up on nearly every deal that matters.

SOC 2 is technically an attestation, not a certification, but almost nobody searches it that way. Buyers ask "are you SOC 2 certified," so that's the language we'll use here too, while staying accurate about what the report actually is: an independent CPA firm's opinion on whether your controls meet a defined set of criteria, over a period of time.

Why fintech faces more pressure than other sectors

Every SaaS company handles some level of customer data risk. Fintech handles a different category of exposure entirely. You're often sitting in the data flow between a customer's bank account and their business operations, or holding personally identifiable financial information, or processing transactions that trigger regulatory obligations for your customers, not just for you. That changes who's asking for SOC 2 and why:

  • Banks and payment rails will not integrate without it. If your product connects to a banking partner, card network, or ACH processor, SOC 2 is frequently a hard gate in the partnership agreement, not a nice-to-have.
  • Your customers' own auditors ask about you. When a fintech customer goes through their own financial audit or regulatory exam, your company shows up as a vendor with access to sensitive data. Their auditor wants evidence you're controlled.
  • Fraud and access control get scrutinized harder. Financial data attracts a different threat model than most SaaS categories. Buyers expect to see real controls around who can touch transaction data, not a policy document that was never enforced.
  • Downstream regulatory exposure. Your fintech customers answer to regulators themselves. A weak link in their vendor stack becomes a finding in their exam. SOC 2 is how they get comfortable putting you in that stack.

The net effect is that fintech companies tend to need SOC 2 earlier in their growth curve than other B2B software categories, often before they'd otherwise be ready to build a full compliance program from scratch.

The five Trust Services Criteria, and what actually matters

SOC 2 reports are built around five Trust Services Criteria: security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. Security is the only one that's mandatory. Everything else is scoped in based on what your product actually does and what your customers are asking about. For most fintech companies, the scoping conversation lands on security plus one or two others:

  • Availability matters if your product is in the transaction path and downtime means your customer's payments or transfers stop moving.
  • Confidentiality matters if you're storing account numbers, financial statements, or other data your customers have contractually committed to protecting.
  • Processing integrity comes up if you're calculating balances, running settlement logic, or otherwise producing financial outputs your customer relies on being correct.

Adding criteria you don't need adds audit cost and control burden without moving the needle on deals. Skipping a criterion your biggest prospects actually ask about means redoing the scope later. Getting this right up front is one of the highest-leverage decisions in the whole process, and it's usually where companies waste the most time when they try to figure it out on their own.

How traztech scopes SOC 2 readiness for fintech

traztech runs fixed-scope SOC 2 readiness engagements, then coordinates with an independent CPA firm to issue the actual report. We're not the auditor, and we don't pretend to be. Under the AICPA framework, the entity doing your readiness prep can't also be the one signing the opinion. Our job is to get you to the point where that audit is fast, clean, and doesn't surface surprises. For fintech clients specifically, that scoping work starts with the questions above: what's in your transaction path, what financial data you store or transmit, and which of your target customers' vendor risk teams are going to be reading the report. From there we map your existing controls against the criteria you actually need, close the gaps that would fail an audit, and build the evidence trail an auditor expects to see, access logs, change management records, incident response documentation, vendor risk reviews for your own subprocessors. Fintech engagements tend to spend more time than average on a few specific areas: encryption key management, segregation of duties around who can move money or approve transactions, and third-party risk management for the banking partners and payment processors you depend on. These aren't generic SaaS controls. They're the ones a fintech-savvy vendor risk analyst will look for first. This work sits inside our broader compliance readiness practice, where we run the same fixed-scope model for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and related frameworks, so if your roadmap includes more than one certification down the line, the groundwork doesn't have to be redone from scratch.

What this means if you're evaluating timing

The most common mistake we see is fintech founders waiting until a specific deal forces the issue, then trying to compress a multi-month readiness process into a few weeks because procurement is holding a signature. SOC 2 readiness takes real time regardless of who runs it: policies need to exist before they can be followed, controls need to run long enough to generate evidence, and a Type 2 report requires an observation period, typically three to twelve months, before the auditor can even issue an opinion. If you're a fintech company and SOC 2 has come up in more than one sales conversation this year, that's usually the signal it's time to scope the work now rather than after it blocks a deal you can't afford to lose.

If you want a straight answer on what SOC 2 would take for your product and your customer base, get in touch with traztech and we'll walk through scope, timeline, and cost before you commit to anything.

Not ready for a call? Same.

Get the playbook, not a sales pitch

If this was useful, Jacob sends a few short, practical notes on the unglamorous side of building a startup. No fluff, unsubscribe in one click. Just reply if you want to talk; it reaches him directly.

From Jacob Masse, founder of traztech. No spam, unsubscribe in one click.

Need help with any of this?

We help startups build secure, scalable infrastructure. Book a free strategy call and let's talk about your stack.

Book a free consultation